THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEAN MULLER and MARIANNICK VAQUIER
____________
Appeal No. 96-3563
Application No. 08/249,0791
____________
HEARD: August 4, 1999
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-9, which
are all of the claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1Application for patent filed May 25, 1994. According to appellants, this
application is a continuation of Application No. 08/037,435, filed March 26, 1993, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007