THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KATUO ASAMI and HITOSHI YOZAWA ____________ Appeal No. 1996-3578 Application No. 08/125,7561 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 17-26, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We REVERSE. 1Application for patent filed Sep. 24, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of serial number 07/755,210, filed Sep. 05,1991, now U.S. Patent 5,309,242, issued May 3, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007