Appeal No. 1996-3600 Application 08/284,371 automatically records programs by entering data into the system individually for channel, date, time of day and program length. The examiner notes that Beyers does not teach that the coded data is compressed, that a decoder is used to expand the coded information, and that the compressed codes are entered into the system as recited in claims 106 and 142 [answer, pages 4-7]. Welles teaches a universal remote control which can learn the commands of other remote controls. After the universal remote control of Welles learns the commands of another remote control, the learned commands are stored in memory in a compressed form to save memory space. The examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to substitute the universal remote control of Welles for the Beyers remote control to gain the advantage of reducing the number of remote control units as taught by Welles [id., pages 7-9]. Appellants’ first argument is that Beyers fails to disclose either of the elements or steps of independent claims 106 and 142. Beyers teaches a conventional on-screen remote control unit for a video recorder in which channel, date, time 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007