Appeal No. 96-3637
Application No. 08/248,123
circuitry for reading, from said second memory, said stored second portion of said
sequence of frames from said prerecorded source of frames in accordance with said second directional
signal indicative of said second direction that said user had been facing; and
a display coupled to said second memory for displaying said stored second portion of
said sequence of frames.
The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of obviousness are:
Smith 4,985,762 Jan. 15, 1991
Lewis et al. (Lewis) 5,177,872 Jan. 12, 1993
Claims 1-5, 8-12 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 as being
unpatentable over Smith.
Claims 6, 7, 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
' 103 as being unpatentable over Smith in view of Lewis.
The respective positions of the examiner and the
appellants with regard to the propriety of these rejections
are set forth in the final rejection (Paper No. 4) and the
examiner=s answer (Paper No. 10) and the appellants= brief
(Paper No. 9) and reply brief (Paper No. 12).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007