THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT R. R. RODITE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3639
Application No. 08/076,5041
____________
ON BRIEF2
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-9, which
are all of the claims pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
Application for patent filed June, 14, 1993. According to appellant, this application is a1
continuation-in-part of serial number 07/732,014, filed July 18, 1991.
The oral hearing was waived in a letter filed October 11, 1999.2
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007