THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte LEE D. WILLSON
and DANIEL J. WINARSKI
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3668
Application 08/314,5741
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, BARRETT and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 8-12, all the claims pending in
1Application for patent filed September 28, 1994. According to appellants, this application is
a continuation of Application 07/757,797, filed September 11, 1991, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007