THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JERRY J. WEERS and TIMOTHY J. O’BRIEN
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3673
Application No. 08/139,8931
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 14-35.
1Application for patent filed October 19, 1993.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 08/031,062, filed March 12, 1993, now
Patent No. 5,284,576, issued February 8, 1994; which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/388,210, filed August 1,
1989.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007