THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MOHAMMED F. BACCHUS, BRUCE M. DAWSON
and GARY A. O’NEILL
__________
Appeal No. 96-3679
Application 08/179,8611
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1-9, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. We reverse.
Application for patent filed January 11, 1994.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007