THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICCARDO BALLONI, MICHAEL T. HEFFELFINGER,
MARK W. LOCKHART, ROBERT G. PEET
and EILEEN A. STETTER
__________
Appeal No. 96-3690
Application 08/2345161
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection
of claims 14-19, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. We affirm.
The Claimed Subject Matter
Application for patent filed April 28, 1994. According to appellants, the application is a continuation1
of Application 07/947,231 filed September 18, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007