THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 42
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte AKIHIKO TERADA, MASAYUKI SAITO,
TAKASHI TOYAMA, NORITADA NAGAO,
and MINORU FUJISAWA
__________
Appeal No. 96-3726
Application 08/074,0091
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and GARRIS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed June 9, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/747,477, filed August 13, 1991; which is a continuation of
Application 07/399,567, filed August 23, 1989.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007