Ex parte NAYLOR et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 96-3728                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/132,078                                                                                                             

                 These are all of the claims remaining in the application.                                                                              
                          The subject matter on appeal relates to a tamper                                                                              
                 resistant magnetic stripe for encoding by magnetic particle                                                                            
                 rotation and to a method for encoding a magnetic stripe.  This                                                                         
                 appealed subject matter is adequately illustrated by                                                                                   
                 independent claims 2 and 22 which read as follows:2                                                                                    
                          2. A tamper resistant magnetic stripe for encoding by                                                                         
                 magnetic particle rotation comprising:                                                                                                 
                          a radiation crosslinkable material which is solid at                                                                          
                 ambient temperature and which before cross-linking has a                                                                               
                 viscosity of 1,200 poise or less at 40EC; and                                                                                          
                          magnetized particles of a magnetic composition in                                                                             
                 suspended distribution throughout said crosslinkable material,                                                                         
                 said particles have a coercivity of at least 5 kOe;                                                                                    
                          said particles in selected regions of said material being                                                                     
                 substantially all similarly aligned with respect to their                                                                              
                 magnetic polarity and the material of said regions is cross-                                                                           
                 linked, and in the remaining regions of said material the                                                                              
                 particles therein being substantially all similarly aligned                                                                            
                 with respect to their magnetic polarity in a direction which                                                                           
                 is 180E opposed to said particles in said selected cross-                                                                              
                 linked regions;                                                                                                                        
                          wherein said selected and remaining regions alternate                                                                         
                 along said stripe to define a magnetic code.                                                                                           


                          2We observe that claims 22 and 23 have been inaccurately                                                                      
                 reproduced in the appendix of the appellants’ brief.  Suffice                                                                          
                 it to say that our decision on this appeal is based upon the                                                                           
                 actual language of the appealed claims rather than the                                                                                 
                 inaccurate language of the appellants’ claim reproductions.                                                                            
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007