THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD O. CARMACK, HOWARD C. FREEMAN, CHARLES V.
GREEN, DAVID S. HERRON, DARREN C. MARTIN, G. SCOTT RULONG, MARK
J. SIMMONS, KARL SZABO, RAYMOND E. SZKOTAK, LI-WUN CHEN TAM,
ROBERT C. ULESKI, FRANK W. WAGLE, and STEPHEN T. WEST
____________
Appeal No. 96-3765
Application No. 08/209,5221
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 4, 13, 14, 21 through 24, 33,
and 34. Claims 5 through 12, 15 through 20, 25 through 32,
and 35 through 40 have been canceled. Claims 41 through 52
1Application for patent filed March 10, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007