THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 50
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PETER HABERMEYER
__________
Appeal No. 96-3886
Application 08/275,0911
___________
HEARD: March 10, 1999
___________
Before McCANDLISH Senior Administrative Patent Judges,
McQUADE and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
1Application for patent filed July 14, 1994. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/812,874, filed December 20, 1991 now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/474,025, filed June
4, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007