Ex parte KAZMIERCZAK et al. - Page 2





               Appeal No. 96-3898                                                                                                  
               Application 08/420,441                                                                                              



               been amended.                                                                                                       

                       The invention relates to a device for clamping discs to a hub in a disc drive.                              

                       The independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                           

                       1.  A data disc support assembly for supporting at least one high capacity data disc relative to a head     
               so data on a surface of the disc is accessible by the head, the head having a head height, wherein the high         
               capacity data disc is for use with a disc drive in a portable computer, the support assembly comprising:            

                       a hub having first and second axial ends and a flange extending from the second axial end, the flange       
               supporting the data disc; and                                                                                       

                       a clamp connected to the hub to rigidly connect the data disc to the hub, the clamp being a thermally       
               responsive clamp connected to the hub by a thermal shrink fit, the clamp having a first generally annular           
               portion contacting the data disc and a second generally annular portion extending radially away from the hub        
               beyond the first annular portion and being spaced from the data disc by a distance greater than the head            
               height.                                                                                                             

                       The Examiner relies on the following references:                                                            

               Barton et al. (Barton)                                2,023,257              Dec. 28, 1979                          
               (UK Patent Application)                                                                                             

               Appellants' admitted prior art                                                                                      

                       Claims 1 through 4, 6, 7, 17 through 19 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                

               unpatentable over Appellants' admitted prior art and Barton.                                                        












                                                                2                                                                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007