Ex parte WOODS - Page 8




          Appeal No. 96-3901                                                          
          Application 08/192,638                                                      



          range of one half of the peak to valley amplitude.  Bremmer                 
          does not teach measuring the maximum amplitude in the read                  
          signal for each disc drive system.                                          


                    We appreciate the Examiner's argument that Bremmer                
          teaches that the reference level is based on a maximum and                  
          minimum track signal amplitude which, as the Examiner reasons,              
          requires the measurement of the track maximum amplitude.                    
          However, "[t]o establish inherency, the extrinsic evidence                  
          'must make clear that the missing descriptive matter is                     
          necessarily present in the thing described in the reference,                
          and that it would be so recognized by persons of ordinary                   
          skill.'"  In re Robertson, 169 F3d 743, 745, 49 USPQ2d 1949,                
          1950-51 (Fed. Cir. 1999) citing Continental Can Co. v.                      
          Monsanto Co., 948 F.2d 1264, 1268, 20 USPQ2d 1746, 1749 (Fed.               
          Cir. 1991).  "Inherency, how- ever, may not be established by               
          probabilities or possibilities.  The mere fact that a certain               
          thing may result from a given set of circumstances is not                   
          sufficient."  Id. citing Continental,     948 F.2d at 1269, 20              
          USPQ2d at 1749.  From reading Bremmer as a whole, we find that              

                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007