THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN L. BECK, THOMAS A. GREGORY
and CHRISTOPHER G. KELLER
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3903
Application No. 08/305,2251
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, JERRY SMITH, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 33-52,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed November 13, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of 07/922,920 filed July 30, 1992. We note that this application may not be a proper
continuation under Rule 60 since the drawing in this application are not a true copy of those filed in the
parent application 07/922,920 filed July 30, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007