Appeal No. 1996-3931 Application No. 08/198,336 polymer component of appellants’ adhesive is -15 to +15°C. Accordingly, the examiner’s factual finding that the Weist polymer which has a T of -20°C “[i]s within the scope” of the g claimed polymeric component is clearly erroneous. See the answer at page 5. Further, although the examiner alternatively contends that the T s of the claimed and prior g art poylmers are “very close” (answer, page 3), the examiner points to no reason, suggestion, or teaching in the Weist reference that would have motivated a person of ordinary skill in the art to utilize a polymer having a T in the range g required by the polymeric component of the appealed claims. Thus, a prima facie case of obviousness has not been established for the subject matter defined by the appealed claims. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is reversed. OTHER ISSUES Before taking any further action in this application, the examiner should obtain an English translation for Japanese Kokai 57 087481 published May 31, 1982 to determine whether this reference contains anticipating examples of the herein claimed composition. An abstract of this publication is of 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007