THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WILLIAM P. ENLOW
and ROGER W. AVAKIAN
__________
Appeal No. 1996-3934
Application 08/288,6701
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-10.
Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced below:
1. An extrusion process for making a polyolefin film,
said process comprising:
1 Application for patent filed August 9, 1994. According to appellants, the
application is a division of 08/038,413, filed March 29, 1993, now U.S. Patent No.
5,414,034, issued May 9, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007