THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte E. SCOTT HENKINS and JOHN C. WITTENAUER
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3937
Application No. 08/319,7021
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ and LORIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-5 and 7-12.
Claim 1 and 9 are representative and are reproduced
below:
1. An additive dust free blend consisting essentially of
compacted particles having a substantially circular cross-
1Application for patent filed October 7, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007