Ex parte GREEN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3945                                                          
          Application 08/095,016                                                      




               Representative claim 21 is reproduced below:                           
               21.  A simulated print making processor, said processor                
          comprising:                                                                 
               means forming a part of said print making processor for                
          receiving a transparent substrate, having a mirror image                    
          thereon, from a printer used for creating said mirror image                 
          on said transparent substrate;                                              
               means in said auxiliary print making processor for moving              
          said transparent substrate and a reflective backing member                  
          into superimposed relationship; and                                         
               means in said auxiliary print making processor for                     
          simultaneously applying heat and pressure to said transparent               
          substrate and said backing member thereby causing them to                   
          adhere to each other to form a simulated photographic print.                

               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
          Ambro et al. (Ambro)          4,657,831           Apr. 14, 1987             
          Kinoshita et al. (Kinoshita)       5,138,392           Aug. 11,             
          1992                                                                        
               Claims 1, 21 through 26, 34 and 35 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner                  
          relies upon Ambro alone as to claims 1 and 21, with the                     
          addition of Kinoshita as to claims 22 through 26, 34 and 35.                
               Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and                 
          the examiner, reference is made to the brief and the answer                 
          for the respective details thereof.                                         
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007