THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NICHOLAS T. CHEESEBROW,
SHAWN D. EGGUM, ROBERT D. KOS
and RANDY S. WILLIAMS
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3964
Application 08/225,2281
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 10-20, which constituted all the claims remaining in
the application. Claims 1-9 were canceled earlier in the
1Application for patent filed April 8, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007