THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PETER G. BORDEN and JAMES B. STOLZ
____________
Appeal No. 96-3969
Application No. 08/271,3111
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MARTIN, BARRETT and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 3, 4, and 6-8, which constitute all the claims in
the application. Claims 2 and 5 have been canceled.
The claimed invention relates to a method and a
configuration for reducing stray light errors in a particle
1Application for patent filed July 6, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007