Appeal No. 1996-3975 Application No. 08/328,179 parallel with the reactor. Furthermore, only one of the tanks, the low pressure flash tank, has an outlet with a conduit connected to an analyzer transducer. Therefore, we conclude that the combination of Mori and Goffinet does not result in the claimed subject matter. The examiner admits that Mori does not teach the use of either first or second flash separation tanks. See Answer, page 3. As for Goffinet, patentee discloses only a single low pressure flash separation tank 13 which is attached to the reactor via a conduit for reactor effluent stream 11. See column 4, lines 5-17, and Figure. Although the flash separation tank 13 is connected to a sampling point and analyzer 19 this does not result in the structure required by the claimed subject matter. See Goffinet, column 4, lines 22-26. Stated otherwise, the claimed subject matter recites a structure wherein two flash separation tanks are attached to the reactor in parallel via conduits. The high pressure flash separation tank which has no connections to an analyzer transducer is neither disclosed nor suggested by either Mori or Goffinet. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007