THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte FRANCOIS DE KEYSER
________________
Appeal No. 96-3991
Application No. 08/311,2421
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and SPIEGEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-6,
8 and 12-14, all the claims remaining in the present
application. Claim 1 is illustrative:
Application for patent filed September 23, 1994.1
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/835,151, filed February 13, 1992, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,413,828, issued May 9, 1995.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007