Appeal No. 1996-3996
Application 08/250,578
disclosed embodiment, or any other embodiment within the scope of the claims would not meet
the stated objectives. We find that Appellant’s disclosure meets the requirements of 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph. Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of the claims
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 through 5
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
STUART N. HECKER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MRF/dal
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007