THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANDREA SAVONUZZI ____________ Appeal No. 1996-4072 Application No. 08/133,2831 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 46-57, 59, 61 and 63-65. Claims 58, 60 1Application for patent filed October 7, 1993. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 07/780,060 filed October 21, 1991, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007