Appeal No. 96-4092
Application 08/278,363
In regard to the rejection of claim 3 and the
rejection of claim 5, we note that the Examiner relies on
Meise as above. For the same reasons above, we fail to find
that Meise teaches or suggests Appellant's claimed limitation
of correcting pixel color values of more than one color based
upon dependence of at least one further pixel color value of a
given pixel. Therefore, we will not sustain these rejections
for the same reasons above.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1
through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's
decision is reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007