THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 54
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MASASHI NAGANO
________________
Appeal No. 96-4094
Application 08/282,7831
________________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 8, 1999
________________
Before MEISTER, STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
1Application for patent filed July, 25, 1994. According
to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
08/034,213, filed March 19, 1993, now abandoned, and a
continuation of Application 07/633,767, filed December 26,
1990, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007