THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PIETER J. VAN DER ZAAG, KLASS VEGTER,
PETRUS H. ANTONIS and PIETER J. VAN DER VALK
____________
Appeal No. 96-4196
Application No. 08/239,0101
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 7, 10 through 13, 15 through 17, 19 through 25 and 28
through 30. Claims 31 and 32 are allowable over the art of
record, and claims 8, 9, 14, 18, 26 and 27 would be allowable
if rewritten in independent form including all of the
1Application for patent filed May 5, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007