Appeal No. 1007-0016
Application No. 08/162,333
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs and Answer for the 2
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the Examiner, the arguments
in support of the rejections and the evidence of obviousness
relied upon by the Examiner as support for the rejections. We
have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in
reaching our decision, Appellant’s arguments set forth in the
Briefs along with the Examiner’s rationale in support of the
rejections and arguments in rebuttal set forth in the
Examiner’s Answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that the disclosure in this application describes the
claimed invention in a manner which complies with the
requirements of
2The Appeal Brief was filed January 26, 1996. In
response to the Examiner’s Answer dated April 16, 1996, a
Reply Brief was filed June 17, 1996 which was entered by the
Examiner without further comment on July 9, 1996.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007