THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WALTER HILLEN, STEPHAN RUPP
and ULRICH SCHIEBEL
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0033
Application No. 08/157,8421
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
1Application for patent filed November 24, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/661,037, filed February 25, 1991, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007