THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEROME SWARTZ, RAJ BRIDGELALL, RON GOLDMAN,
EUGENE JOSEPH and JOSEPH KATZ
____________
Appeal No. 97-0171
Application No. 08/187,2901
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, FLEMING, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3, 8, 9,
18 and 19, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed January 27, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007