THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEPHEN P. CAPPS
and ERNEST H. BEERNINK
_____________
Appeal No. 97-0191
Application 08/331,1511
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-4 and 7-38, all of the clams
pending in the application. Claims 5 and 6 have been canceled. An amendment after final rejection
1Application for patent filed October 28, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application of 08/117,431, filed September 7, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007