Appeal No. 1997-0211
Application No. 08/252,288
appellant’s arguments made in the appeal brief, and we will not speculate as to the proper
application of the art to the claims. Since the Examiner has not adequately addressed the
limitations of the claims, the Examiner has not presented a prima facie case of
obviousness, and we will not sustain the rejection of claim 3 and claims 4, 5 and 9-14
grouped therewith which contain limitations to the integrating means.
CONCLUSION
To summarize:
the decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1, 2 and 6-8 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 is affirmed; and the decision of the Examiner to reject claims 3-5 and 9-14 under 35
U.S.C. 103 is reversed.
The Examiner's decision is affirmed-in-part.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007