THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHING-YUH TSAY and HUGH P. MC ADAMS
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0258
Application No. 08/251,0521
____________
HEARD: November 2, 1999
____________
Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-12. Amendments after final rejection filed August
7, 1995, March 29, 1996, and July 12, 1996 were entered by the
Examiner. As a result of these amendments, claims 5 and 11
have been canceled and the rejection of claim 6 has been
1Application for patent filed May 31, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007