THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS G. FALUDY and BRENT W. MURRAY ____________ Appeal No. 1997-0276 Application No. 08/357,6411 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, PATE, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. PATE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 10 as amended after final rejection. These are all the claims remaining in the application. 1Application filed December 15, 1994 for reissue of U.S. Patent No. 5,171,056, issued December 15, 1992, based on application 07/810,220, filed December 19, 1991.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007