Appeal No. 1997-0411 Page 10 Application No. 08/441,658 For the foregoing reasons, the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claims 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 34. CONCLUSION To summarize, the examiner’s rejection of claims 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007