Ex parte PUTSCH - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1997-0668                                                        
          Application No. 08/232,854                                                  


          explained why this specification disclosure would support her               
          contrary perspective.                                                       
               In summary, we have not sustained either the § 112 or the              
          § 103 rejections of claims 9, 11 and 18 through 25 which the                
          examiner has advanced on this appeal.                                       




























                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007