Ex parte ALEXANDER et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1997-0674                                                        
          Application No. 08/214,971                                                  

          one.  We fail to perceive any teaching, suggestion or                       
          incentive which would have led one of ordinary skill in the                 
          art to do so, except for the hindsight accorded one who first               
          viewed the appellants’ disclosure.  This, of course, is                     
          impermissible as a basis for deprecating an invention.  See In              
          re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1784 (Fed.                  
          Cir. 1992).                                                                 
                                       SUMMARY                                        
               The rejection is not sustained.                                        






















                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007