THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KANTI JAIN
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0689
Application No. 08/047,2381
____________
HEARD: October 20, 1999
____________
Before HAIRSTON, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 12, 14, 18, and 23 through 27. Claims
2 through 11, 13, 15 through 17, 19 through 22, 28 through 30,
and 32 are allowed. Claim 31 is objected to for an
informality. Appellant has submitted a proposed correction to
claim 31 which the examiner (Answer, page 3) has agreed to
Application for patent filed April 13, 1993.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007