THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RICHARD D. HEIN and WALTER J. KELLY ____________ Appeal No. 1997-0726 Application No. 08/329,3981 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before MEISTER, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 5, which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1Application for patent filed October 26, 1994. According to the appellants, the application is a division of Application No. 08/158,713, filed November 24, 1993, now U.S. Patent No. 5,848,782; which was a continuation of Application No. 07/874,930, filed April 28, 1992, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007