THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GEORGE A. SPIX, DIANE M. WENGELSKI, STUART W.
HAWKINSON, MARK D. JOHNSON, JEREMIAH D. BURKE, KEITH J.
THOMPSON, GREGORY G. GAERTNER, GIACOMO G. BRUSSINO, RICHARD E.
HESSEL, DAVID M. BARKAI, STEVE S. CHEN, STEVEN G. OSLON, ROBERT
E. STROUT II, JON A. MASAMITSU, DAVID M. COX, LINDA J. O'GARA,
KELLY T. O'HAIR, DAVID A. SEBERGER, JAMES C. RASBOLD, TIMOTHY J.
CRAMER, DON A. VAN DYKE, and ASHOK CHANDRAMOULI
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0760
Application No. 08/003,0001
____________
HEARD: November 15, 1999
____________
Before THOMAS, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed January 11, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a division of Application No. 07/537,466,
filed June 11, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,179,702, which is a continuation-
in-part of Application No. 07/459,083, filed December 29, 1989, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,197,130.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007