THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HIROSHI SUMIHIRO
HIDEKI KOYANAGI,
SEIICHI EMOTO,
and TOHRU WADA
_____________
Appeal No. 97-0801
Application 08/168,0871
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims
1-8, which constitute all the claims in the application. An amendment after final rejection was filed on
1Application for patent filed December 14, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007