THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANSPETER HAUSER,
WERNER H. GERBER,
ABUL IQBAL and PIERRE MAURER
__________
Appeal No. 97-0840
Application 08/159,4051
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 2 through 9, which are
the only claims remaining in this application.
Appellants’ invention is directed to a method of
producing forgery-proof colored printed articles which cannot
1 Application for patent filed November 30, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007