THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID A. SCHULZ
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0842
Application No. 08/305,5881
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 8 through 12 which are all of the claims
remaining in the application.
Claim 11 is representative of the subject matter on
appeal and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed September 14, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007