THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MOHAMMAD A. KHAN and DAVID P. HOPKINS
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0926
Application No. 08/552,0451
______________
HEARD: September 13, 1999
_______________
Before COHEN, McQUADE and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 9, which are all of the claims
1Application for patent filed November 2, 1995. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of application no. 08/294,213,
filed August 22, 1994, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007