THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte YUKIHISA TAKEUCHI and TSUTOMU NANATAKI
__________
Appeal No. 1997-0947
Application 08/385,9261
___________
HEARD: OCTOBER 5, 1999
___________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 7,
which constitute all of the claims pending in the application.2
1Application for patent filed February 9, 1995. Appellants rely upon a foreign priority filing date under 35
U.S.C. § 119 of February 14, 1994.
2Claims 8 to 10 were canceled as per appellants’ after final amendment dated August 29, 1996.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007