Appeal No. 97-1035
Application 08/217,657
does not justify a conclusion that the differences between the
subject matter recited in claim 7 and its dependent claims 2,
3, 5, 6 and 8 through 10 and the prior art are such that the
subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time
the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in
the art. Therefore, we shall not sustain the standing 35
U.S.C. § 103 rejections of these claims.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007