THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN F. FOLEY, STEVEN L. PLEE
and DONALD J. REMBOSKI JR.
__________
Appeal No. 97-1070
Application 08/100,4181
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 11, 14
to 16, 28 to 33, 37, and 38. Claim 36 has been canceled. In the final rejection (page 3), the examiner2
1 Application for patent filed August 02, 1993.
2 Claim 36 was canceled in response to the first Office action as per appellants’ instructions at the top of
page 3 of the amendment dated April 3, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007