THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MADHAVAN PISHARODI
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1145
Application No. 08/210,2291
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-4, 16 and 17. Claims 7-15 have been
withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected
invention, claims 18 and 19 have been canceled, claims 21 and
1Application for patent filed March 18, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007